{"id":576473,"date":"2024-02-23T06:35:39","date_gmt":"2024-02-23T06:35:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ktsl888.com\/?p=576473"},"modified":"2024-02-23T06:35:39","modified_gmt":"2024-02-23T06:35:39","slug":"bitcoin-wallets-bleed-730k-investors-exit-despite-record-7-billion-etf-inflows","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ktsl888.com\/news\/bitcoin-wallets-bleed-730k-investors-exit-despite-record-7-billion-etf-inflows\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin Wallets Bleed: 730K Investors Exit Despite Record $7 Billion ETF Inflows"},"content":{"rendered":"
The long-awaited arrival of spot Bitcoin ETFs has ignited a gold rush in the crypto world, attracting both newcomers and seasoned investors. While these new investment vehicles offer a convenient and accessible way to gain exposure to Bitcoin<\/a>, their impact on the cryptocurrency’s core principles and long-term stability remains a complex question.<\/p>\n The data paints a fascinating picture. Following the SEC’s approval of 11 ETFs<\/a>, the number of non-zero Bitcoin wallets initially soared, reaching a peak of nearly 53 million in January. This surge was likely fueled by the accessibility and security offered by ETFs, attracting individuals previously hesitant to directly engage with the intricacies of crypto wallets and exchanges.<\/p>\n However, according to data provided by Santiment, a concerning trend emerged 30 days later: nearly 730,000 fewer wallets held any Bitcoin, suggesting a potential shift towards holding through ETFs instead of directly owning the tokens. This raises questions about the long-term impact on Bitcoin’s decentralized nature and the potential for decreased on-chain activity.<\/p>\n \ud83d\udcca There are 729.4K less #Bitcoin<\/a> wallets holding greater than 0 $BTC<\/a>, compared to one month ago. After the #SEC<\/a> approved 11 Spot Bitcoin #ETF<\/a>‘s, this amount of non-0 wallets peaked on January 20th at 52.95M. This is attributed to the increased interest in #hodlers<\/a><\/p>\n (Cont) \ud83d\udc47 pic.twitter.com\/FThtSDOmk0<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Santiment (@santimentfeed) February 21, 2024<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n While the ETF market is thriving, its impact on Bitcoin’s core principles is less clear. The recent record volume and inflows exceeding $7 billion across the top 7 ETFs highlight strong market interest and the potential for mainstream adoption.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n However, it’s crucial to remember that these ETFs can hold both actual Bitcoin and futures contracts. This means investors gain exposure without directly impacting the underlying supply or demand of the cryptocurrency itself. This raises questions about whether ETFs are truly driving adoption or simply creating a derivative-based market with its own set of risks and dynamics.<\/p>\n Perhaps the most concerning trend is the surge in speculative trading using derivatives. Open interest on centralized exchanges, particularly for Bitcoin, has reached unprecedented levels, exceeding $10 billion for the first time since July 2022.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n This indicates investors are taking on more risk by leveraging derivatives, potentially fueled by the “crowd euphoria” surrounding Bitcoin and the allure of potentially quick gains. This echoes the speculative frenzy seen in 2017, raising concerns about potential market volatility and potential crashes. Ethereum, Solana, and Chainlink also exhibit significant open interest, suggesting broader market-wide trends beyond just Bitcoin.<\/p>\nBitcoin ETF: Initial Surge, But Ownership Shift A Concern<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
ETF Boom, But Supply\/Demand Dynamics Unchanged<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Source: Santiment<\/pre>\n
Speculation Surges, Raising Red Flags<\/strong><\/h3>\n
BTC market cap remains in the $1 trillion region. Chart: TradingView.com<\/a><\/pre>\n