{"id":546196,"date":"2023-08-08T13:40:23","date_gmt":"2023-08-08T13:40:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ktsl888.com\/?p=546196"},"modified":"2024-06-12T09:25:09","modified_gmt":"2024-06-12T09:25:09","slug":"terra-luna-token-burn-proposal-greenlit-could-1-be-hittable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ktsl888.com\/news\/terra-luna-token-burn-proposal-greenlit-could-1-be-hittable\/","title":{"rendered":"Terra Luna Token Burn Proposal Greenlit – Could $1 Be Hittable?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Terra Luna has seen the successful approval of community proposals 11658 and 11660, authorizing the retrieval and subsequent incineration of a total of 800 million USTC. The prevailing sentiment within the community leans towards directing these USTC tokens towards the burn address as opposed to reintegrating them into the community pool.<\/span><\/p>\n Conversely, a noteworthy shift has been detected in LUNC’s staking ratio within the past day, where a previous upward trajectory has now given way to a decline. This alteration in the staking ratio commonly signifies reduced assurance among stakers regarding a specific asset.<\/span><\/p>\n Here\u2019s what\u2019s going on within the struggling Terra community:<\/span><\/p>\n In a significant turn of events, Proposal 11658 titled “Return of Community funds not used,” <\/span>presented by Vegas<\/span><\/a>, a former member of the ex-Terra Rebels developer group, has achieved approval with an affirmative vote percentage of 70.27%.<\/span><\/p>\n And it seems that once again.someone is fighting against us… So the 200 milion ustc that RH have “missed” used.. is one of the reasons that I was so vocal to not send all the rest of the funds to the CP. Now seems that is already moviments asking the signers to not do,the 11658\u2026<\/p>\n \u2014 Vegas (@VegasMorph) August 8, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Vegas has advocated for the reintegration of 800 million USTC on-chain funds back into the Terra Luna Classic community pool. This proposition stems from the observation that the Ozone Protocol project is presently deviating from the proposed development plan.<\/span><\/p>\n In a parallel development, Proposal 11660, labeled “Burn 100% of Funds Should Prop: 11658 Pass,” has garnered substantial support, amassing a “Yes” vote share of 82.55%. This counter-proposal asserts that a substantial segment of the community is advocating for the incineration of the 800 million tokens. <\/span><\/p>\n Consequently, even if Proposal 11658 is ratified, the counter-proposal is poised to take precedence due to its higher vote count.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Awaiting the community’s consideration is another proposal, suggesting the <\/span>burning of 80% of the funds<\/span><\/a> while allocating the remaining 20% to the community pool designated for developers. Notably, this proposal has encountered limited favor, with only 46% of the community showing agreement.<\/span><\/p>\n The aftermath of these recent updates has naturally sparked curiosity regarding their impact on the price dynamics of LUNC. How are these decisions influencing the valuation of the token?<\/span><\/p>\n Bringing the most recent developments to the forefront, there has been a notable decrease in the percentage of LUNC staked within the past 24 hours. This shift indicates that holders and users are opting to un-stake their holdings, signifying a diminished level of trust and confidence in the token’s performance. <\/span><\/p>\n The implications of this trend raise questions about the current sentiment surrounding LUNC.<\/span><\/p>\nRecent Community Decisions Shape Terra Luna Future<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
Total crypto market cap reaches $1.12 trillion today. Chart: TradingView.com<\/a><\/pre>\n
Staking Confidence Wanes As LUNC Faces Price Challenges<\/strong><\/h2>\n