{"id":386315,"date":"2019-06-16T18:00:47","date_gmt":"2019-06-16T18:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ktsl888.com\/?p=386315"},"modified":"2024-06-11T08:36:14","modified_gmt":"2024-06-11T08:36:14","slug":"multi-billion-dollar-crypto-firm-bitcoin-finding-use-as-hedge-for-global-crisis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ktsl888.com\/news\/multi-billion-dollar-crypto-firm-bitcoin-finding-use-as-hedge-for-global-crisis\/","title":{"rendered":"Multi-Billion Dollar Crypto Firm: Bitcoin Finding Use as Hedge for Global Crisis"},"content":{"rendered":"
Throughout its short history,\u00a0Bitcoin (BTC)<\/a>\u00a0has been seen as anything but centralized, sovereign, and censorable. The crypto asset was created by a pseudonymous individual, is secured by a global group of miners, and is backed by no government, traditional finance system, or common entity.<\/p>\n And as a result, many have looked to Bitcoin and its brethren \u2014 other digital assets \u2014 as a much-needed\u00a0escape hatch<\/a>\u00a0from fiat and government overreach. Indeed, BTC was released in the wake (and seemingly as a result) of the 2008 Great Depression, and many that have since flocked to the cryptocurrency are staunch anti-establishment proponents.<\/p>\n Some, however, have denied this key narrative. Cynics of the theory remark that BTC is too nascent to be used as a proper store of value, citing the periods of volatility, especially the downturns, as a perfect case in point. Regardless, a massive cryptocurrency firm recently laid out why these naysayers may be wrong in their postulation.<\/p>\n Grayscale’s<\/a> industry-famous research department recently released<\/a> a report titled “Hedging Global Liquidity Risk with Bitcoin”. In it, the firm explained how the leading cryptocurrency is becoming used as a hedge in financial crises and periods of geopolitical turmoil.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n More specifically, the crypto investment firm looked into how the asset can be used during bouts in which there is high “liquidity risk”, the “risk of a real decline in wealth resulting from an imbalance in the amount of money and credit relative to debt in a given economy.”<\/p>\n To back this point, Grayscale looks to three primary facets of Bitcoin’s existence: store of value, spending viability, and growth possibility.<\/p>\n Firstly, as the company has characteristics, BTC can act (and has acted) better as a store of value than gold. Unlike the metal, the crypto is mathematically scarce, capped at 21 million units; BTC is decentralized and verifiable through the Internet; BTC is portable and divisible through digital technologies, and is unconfiscatable.<\/p>\n Gold, on the other hand, has an unlimited supply, centralization risks, an inability to be easily divided and moved around, and concerns around its purity. The chart below from Grayscale sums this argument up fairly well.<\/p>\n <\/p>\nRelated Reading: Bitcoin (BTC) Soars Past $9,300 in Massive Weekend Pump: Bulls on Parade<\/a><\/h6>\n
Bitcoin as a Macroeconomic Hedge<\/strong><\/h2>\n