Even though analytics firms like CryptoQuant and Nansen recently confirmed the existence of customer funds on-chain, one of the biggest accusations against Binance at the moment is that it is a “financial black box”. Critics claim that the exchange led by Changpeng Zhao is refusing to disclose financial information.
The exchange counters these charges in its statement. It says that it does not have to disclose a detailed financial status for two reasons: first, it is not a publicly traded company; second, Binance is financially autarchic and doesn’t need external funding. In addition, it has no “intention to go public at this time.”Other Binance “FUD”
A major argument against Binance’s integrity has also been the recent resignation of accountant Mazar and the question of why the company does not hire a “Big Four” auditor. As the statement reiterates, Mazars withdrew from all crypto companies, not just Binance. Regarding the audit by a “Big Four” auditing firm, the exchange clarifies that they have not worked with any crypto company to verify on-chain reserves so far.As for Coinbase’s collaboration with Deloitte, Binance says it is important to distinguish that the audit is aimed at the financial status of the listed company, not the verification of on-chain reserves.
In addition, the exchange sets the record straight that the verification of Bitcoin reserves is just the first step, and on-chain proof of reserves of some mainstream currencies will follow “as soon as possible.”On-chain verification of encrypted corporate reserves is a very new field. At present, we are still actively communicating with companies willing to provide verification services for encrypted companies, and will share the latest progress with you soon.