“Many people say the Korean government should allow ICOs, but ICOs bring uncertainty, and the damage they can cause is too serious and obvious,” Choi said. “For these reasons, many foreign countries ban ICOs or are conservative towards them.”
Lawmakers Recommend ICO Regulation
The remarks appear after the lawmakers’ efforts to make amendments to South Korea’s Electronic Financial Transaction act which does not recognize cryptocurrency transactions.There are currently five crypto-focused bills pending in the National Assembly that seek regulations for cryptos and ICO issuance. The digitized crowdfunding method remains banned since FSC’s direction in September 2017 which, lawmakers believe, is hurting South Korea’s potential in the global blockchain market.
“The National Assembly has officially proposed to allow private ICOs. As the administration is sitting on its hands after imposing a total ban on ICOs in September last year, the National Assembly has come forward with an official recommendation,” the proposal reads. Choi, however, believes ICO rounds are misleading because of weak investor protection and little business planning.Blockchain Exodus
Choi’s remarks about not equating blockchain and cryptos have ended up showing the celebrated regulator’s weak understanding of the digital ledger technology. Digital tokens represent the core purpose of a public ledger, a reward to keep a decentralized network immutable, censorship-free and most importantly, secure. Without it, a blockchain network is no less than a private database.Earlier, companies in the U.S. had also expressed similar concerns to their lawmakers after startups started moving to crypto-friendly countries after feeling threatened by the SEC crackdown.
Featured image from Shutterstock.